Recomendations for 50nl

Posted 2 weeks ago

Preferably where rake is low - rake back is good and decent traffic
Archinator

Last Post 2 days ago by

Archinator

12

Posts

394

Views

Copy post URL
https://www.pokervip.com/forum/free-bankrolls-promotions/recomendations-for-50nl?nav=5c00395fd39043543f8b462c
0
Posted 2 weeks ago
Lol unless you hav a time machine back to 2010 your screwed! Best bet is probably Party!
Posted 1 week ago
micro gaming cap is 3 bb
Posted 4 days ago
Can you use a HUD at micro-gaming?
Posted 3 days ago
i think you can't
Posted 2 days ago
I think Stars, iPoker, WPN and Party Fast fold(can get HH for reg tables but only session stats not lifetime stats on each villain) are sites where HUD is allowed. There may be others but I don't know. There are some that you can get 3rd party programs to write HH to HM2 or PT4 but I don't think its legit.

I think pretty much all 4 of those site have very similar rake structures. I know Party and Stars are about 5%. I think Party's rake cap is slightly less, so you will save a bit in the bigger pots. @50nl Stars will be around 7-8bb/100 in rake. Party has way better rakeback than Stars as Stars is virtually non-existent. I have never played on iPoker, but hear their rake is pretty high, could even be the highest, IDK. So you would have to look at the VIP program you would get from here. I played on WPN but never looked at the rake.

I think Microgaming by far has the lowest overall rake because of the 3bb rake cap. So at 50nl once you reach $1.50 in rake you pay no more, so in the bigger pots this will be a significantly smaller percentage of the pot. Micro also has some pretty good rakeback deals. With 1st deposit bonuses and having the top tier VIP and other bonuses I think you can easily get over 50% rakeback. Kuca would have to comment on the amount of tables. I haven't played much 50nl on Micro, so if you like to mass multitable you might not get enough tables and would have to use multiple sites. I think 4-6 tables is easy enough but not sure tbh.
Posted 2 days ago
trafic is good, you can almost always find 4 table to play and in evening up to 15
Posted 2 days ago
@fawltyfelix what stakes are you playing on wpn, and how much traffic wpn have on NL100 up to NL500
Posted 2 days ago
I don't play there anymore so I don't really know. 25nl traffic was always good. I could try and log in and have a look
Posted 2 days ago
Looking on party Poker's site rake si the same for Nl25 through to 10knl (capped at $3), just seems kinda insane, stars is capped at $2 for 50nl.
https://poker.partypoker.com/en/how-to-play/software/rake-blind-structure

Micro gaming looks good, I tend to play a min of 6 tables though :/ but that rake looks crazy good, did you say aprox 50% RB too!?!?

Ipoker I hear is bot heavy and it is rake heavy too but I think outpips Pokerstars just with RB but I dunno, lots of fish on Stars.

Stars is good rake ($2 cap), great volume through zoom, softwware is awesome and soft (especially with Betsras now feeding in recreationals with their large marketing campaigns)

Best skin to grind a lot Micro gaming? I think I found it difficult to grind last time, played there
Posted 2 days ago
Looking on party Poker's site rake si the same for Nl25 through to 10knl (capped at $3), just seems kinda insane, stars is capped at $2 for 50nl.
https://poker.partypoker.com/en/how-to-play/software/rake-blind-structure

Micro gaming looks good, I tend to play a min of 6 tables though :/ but that rake looks crazy good, did you say aprox 50% RB too!?!?

Ipoker I hear is bot heavy and it is rake heavy too but I think outpips Pokerstars just with RB but I dunno, lots of fish on Stars.

Stars is good rake ($2 cap), great volume through zoom, softwware is awesome and soft (especially with Betsras now feeding in recreationals with their large marketing campaigns)

Best skin to grind a lot Micro gaming? I think I found it difficult to grind last time, played there
Posted 2 days ago
yeah software, even the new one, isn't the greatest IMO on Micro, but you can't really beat the rake and rakeback there. Anon tables there seem to have fish, but need to be quick with table reads, not having HUD, to try and identify who are recs.

Zoom on stars is an absolute nitfest imo. Can steal a ton, but not gonna get paid off much. Maybe 50 and up is better, but I think reg tables are much much better, especially if you have huge samples and can identify who fish are and make sure you have at least one 40+ vpip fish at each of your tables. Not hard to do. Stars rakeback just blows though.

I haven't played on Party in like a year. I want to check it out, but my concern there is that because of the good rakeback that it is just going to attract mostly regs. Not sure what Party is doing to attract recreational players. Maybe some of these huge guarantee tournies and having the casual tables and stuff will help, but really not sure.

@kuca86 doesn't look like very many tables of 100nl+ going on when i looked. Like 3 @100nl maybe 1 @200nl and 1 table @400nl that was only 4/6
Posted 2 days ago
I found 25nl on Stars pretty soft Tbh - not a massive sample though but still like a confidence interval on that shows how soft it looks

Attached Image

Sign Up To Watch More

It only takes 1 minute to register and unlock access to unlimited poker videos.

OR

Take Part In This Promotion

Its easy, simply register with one of the rooms below and add your username to your PokerVIP account

Its easy, simply register with one of the rooms below and add your username to your PokerVIP account.
Add your "Room Name" username and register with PokerVIPEarn 250 VIP Points Instantly & 10 VIP Points for Every $1 in Rake.

"Room Name" Screename:

Register
Login

PokerVIP Credentials:

PokerVIP Credentials: