Erratum about AoF JP rake
@majesz187Actually, half the fee goes to the JP and the other half is considered rake on which rakeback is paid!
This has been in place since
the May 2 changes and is still in force, as I've just learned from the FB support.
Players of the stakes up to $2/4 don't need to worry about this because the JP mechanic is 'Robin Hood': the vast majority of the JP fees is collected from the $4/8-$5/10 tables, whereas about half the money that is collected from the JP lands into smallstakers' bankrolls
because the ratio of the JP share to be won to the JP fee is twice smaller for the $4/8+ stakes.
One avoids paying the fee 8-12% of the time (whenever the stack is entirely lost in an all-in; mind that there's a 'remove chips' button at AoF tables and resetting the stack all the time results in less fee being paid) so the RB is about twice bigger than I wrote previously:
Omaha except $0.25/0.50: ~0.8 bb/100
Omaha $0.25/0.50: ~0.7 bb/100
Holdem except $0.10/0.25: ~1.6 bb/100
Holdem $0.10/0.25: ~1.3 bb/100
The numbers may be quite different because, as it turns out, the loser take all method (distribution of the collected rake among the losers of the hand/spin proportionally to their loss) is used for AoF and Fortune Spin RB as well. That's what caused my initial confusion - I had won too many Fortune Spins and I overestimated the FS component of my RB and underestimated the AoF one.