Its called i300. Its on another website similar to this that I will leave unnamed for obvious reasons. I do not have a journey. Would be nice to do one, but I find it hard to get in all my hands and theory work as it stands, so always felt like a blog would take time away from those, but who knows maybe it would add to my game.
As far as Microgaming goes, its hard to say definitively. I can only go off of my short term results, which, because of the changes, are harder to track. I still can see in my balance how well I am doing and would say that since the changes I have done fairly well. If I had to guess I am up 20+ bi since they changed. The challenge with that assumption is the upswing could be due to a lot of other things. In that same time I did a lot of work on my postflop game with calldowns, flop raises, bet sizes and barrelling. So I could just be better than I was, hard to say. It could be variance and I am just running really well. Although, it doesn't feel like that. I am definitely running decent, but I don't feel like I am in GOD mode at the moment. It certainly seems like there are a lot more fish at the tables, but, as poker player, we know that our minds can play tricks on us and make us think that things are happening way more often than they are or that we always get sucked out on or whatever, but when you go look at the spot it isn't happening nearly as often as you think.
It also kind of happened at a time when I wanted to play for a bit and not use a HUD. HUDs are great, but as
@fergrberger just mentioned in a video recently, and its something
@Jon-PokerVIP was always really good at and tried to teach in videos, that some regs just get too reliant on them. Sometimes you need to play HUDless for a bit so that you can get all the good fundamentals of the game down and learn how to just make good solid decisions in a vacuum. Not saying you don't, but for me, I wanted to make sure I got that part down. I also found myself making the mistake of giving too much weight to stats in the HUD and it was swaying my decisions too much in spots where maybe the stats didn't really mean much. HUDs are great if you have lots of stats and know how to use the numbers to make the right exploits. The challenge is you are rarely going to get a meaningful sample on anyone in Microgaming anyhow. On anon you could only ever get session stats, which would just help you see if someone was loose or tight and might be able to show you if they were aggressive or passive. You can usually figure that stuff out after a couple of orbits anyhow. On reg tables, the players can change their screen names every 30 days or every 1000 hands, so a lot of the players do that so the most amount of hands you will get is 1K, which is really not that significant to be using for postflop stats, especially beyond the flop. I know there are some guys who never change their nick and there are a few guys I do have 4k-8k hands on, but its only a couple and I am just never going to be making my money from them. I make the bulk of my winrate from the fish, who I am never going to get a significant sample on.
Lastly, I kind of look at it like this, and it may or may not be true: With the tracking so severely reduced there is a good side and a bad side. The bad side of it is obvious. You can't use a HUD, meaningfully anyhow. Additionally, it is really hard to track your own progress and win rate. This part of it does suck really bad and it is the part I hate most about the new rule. If I want to be a professional, not being able to track all my hands, my volume, my own stats to find my own leaks, my winrate, etc, makes it really difficult to figure out where you are at. The upside is that, a lot of regs fall into that category of using a HUD and tracking software as a crutch. Much like you are talking about, they are opting to leave MPN and other regs that are not a part of it that were maybe going to sign up, aren't now. This is great for those of us who are willing to put up with the sucky part of it. Just yesterday I think there may have been 1 or 2 tables out of my 6 that were me and anotehr potential reg sitting with 4 suspected fish, with at least 2 of them being obvious fish and I think on the rest of my tables I had at least 1 or 2 suspect fish. There was a lull in the middle of the day where it did seem kind of reggish and got kind of tight and boring, but most of the day was pretty action filled.
So a long winded way to say. I really don't know for sure if it is significantly softer than it was, but it sure feels like it and I am doing really well at the moment.
Hope it was helpful somehow and good luck out there wherever you may land!