Posted 7 years ago
to start off i did win at 50nl the first 80k hands at 12bb/100, wich was sick , and all of the sudden i hit a wall and kind of broke even for 50k hands, while having a decent winrate at 100nl,

Hard to say, but it did seem like the 50nl tables were more reg filled than 100nl
Posted 7 years ago
thats pretty sick. my plan was to stay at 50nl for a longer time, but it seems moving up as soon as its reasonable from a bankroll and winrate perspective seems like the more +EV to do
Posted 7 years ago
I'm fascinated by the way people structure their goals based on past experience and I think you have the right idea when it comes to adjusting yours @KinglyLion. And yeah, NL50 seems to be the bane of existence for many aspiring regs, but it's definitely not unbeatable and discipline that you've mentioned above will be crucial in the process. Good luck!
Posted 7 years ago
I had to move back down to 20nl...


My bankroll peaked at almost 2k when it happened. A huge downswing at 50nl. Like really huge. Combined with some B/C-game towards the end it resulted in me losing more than 20BIs. Probably more than 75% of them at 50nl. Especially towards the end i know that i wasnt on top of my game anymore. I dont know if i was a winning player at 20nl, but i was losing at 50nl for sure. It was especially rough because it happened so fast.

But this is already 1-2 weeks in the past. Towards the end of it i was pretty frustrated. Mostly because i was disappointed by myself. Sure i knew variance would hit harder at 50nl, but i questioned if i was good enough for it even when playing my A-game.

I knew i could easily beat 20nl, but i also knew i had to do something for my confidence, otherwise it would be tough to get back on track. So i booked an out-of-plan coaching session to review the downswing. This session helped me a lot. First of all it showed that i took some unnecessary lines that increased variance and even though they were +EV they certainly weren't optimal. Second of all we could find some leaks i have. That session helped me a lot and i felt way better after. A phrase ive heard JNandez say that stuck with me is "The best way to combat tilt is studying the game". That became some kind of emergency plan for whenever i would start to get tilted, and it worked very well for me so far.

Alright, so the 50NL dream didnt work yet, but it didnt die either, thats not even in question. To be honest, whenever i play focused right now i feel like i play the best poker of my life. The coaching sessions i had in the last weeks/months were all very productive, and i feel like i get better and better each time. My A-game should definetely be enough to beat 50NL right now, and i plan on going back as soon as my bankrollmanagement allows me to do so.

Until then i want to work on a few problems i still have.
1) Play my A-game more often. This is a thing i really want to improve. There are dumb things i do when i am not focused, and i want to cut out those mistakes. I just bought "The mental game of poker 2", maybe that can help in this situation.
2) Get more Volume in. Right now i have a lot of free time. I am working 10 hours a week, and this will even stop in the first part of february. But my poker dealer training will start in the second half of february, and from march on i will be a student. So my free time will be considerably less, and i want to get the best out of the time i have on my hands right now. This problem is connected to problem 1), because i stop playing when i dont feel like i am playing good enough anymore.

There is no graph in this post, and i want to move away from looking to much at my graphs in general. I feel like looking at daily/weekly, maybe even monthly graphs is just being too results oriented. As long as the bankroll is fine i shouldnt worry. I know that i can beat these games, and i should focus on constantly working on my game instead of looking at results. My risk of ruin should be very low because of my bankrollmanagement (take shot at 50nl when BR is 1.5k or above, move down at 1k, so 50BIs for a stake i am sure i beat comfortably, backed up by a 130k hand sample).

The only way is up. Who knows, maybe an upswing happens and i can be back at 50nl when i begin going to university. If not, then thats no problem. I fought my way through this experience, and came out stronger than before, and i am proud of that.
Sometimes mistakes cant be prevented. Errare humanum est. What defines you is what you make out of them.
Posted 7 years ago*
1/2

I am currently watching AdrianFenixx' stream, and he said something that got me thinking. In fact, it got me thinking so much that i wrote a 660 words essay to a friend, talking about Adrians hypothesis. LOL.
I dont want to write this down again just for this blog, so im just gonna copy the message. But first i need to explain some background stuff:

Right now my bankroll dropped back to 800-something. My last 50nl shot ended in a huge disastrous downswing. Part of it was obviously just bad variance, but a big part was me doing dumb stuff. At first not that much, but the more i lost the more i did dumb stuff. Just because i wasnt focused enough. Long story short, i had to move down. No problem. Then i also lost some more at 20nl because i stopped doing dumb shit and started focusing again. I dont think i am on top of my game again, but i am on my way. Currently i am playing 6 tables of 20nl on mpn, with some nice rakeback, you know the deal. But because of my reallife obligations (currently getting trained to become a dealer, will start working this march - will start going to university this march aswell) i dont have the time to grind whenever i want anymore. And my volume is declining a lot.

Right now is the point where what Adrain said comes into play:
"play zoom to learn faster"

The buddy i was chatting with didnt really get what that meant, so i decided to think out loud why i think this statement makes sense for my situation:
Posted 7 years ago*
KinglyLion:
2/2
Alright, let me paraphrase what Adrian said:
"by playing zoom you play more volume vs a tougher field, thus getting put in way more spots that you can learn from."
this is of course especially true for him when he started to learn plo in the last months. because he already had the base from his nlhe skills, and knew how to learn from new spots in plo.

i would apply this slightly differently, but comparable:
right now when i work on my game there are 2 things i can do to improve:
1) recognize mistakes/flaws/leaks in my game and fix them.
fixing them means just recognizing them, and learn to not do them through repetition. trying to focus on those spots in particular all the time until it gets part of my unconcious competence again.
2) learn something new through coaching or whatever, and try to apply that to my game.
applying that to my game means, you guessed it right, learning through repetition. playing over and over, focusing on the spots where i would do the things i just learned, until it gets part of my unconcious competence.

To sum it up: If i want to speed up my learning process i need to get more volume in, to be able to repeat what i need to integrate into my brain. Thus Zoom>Reg when only focus is on learning.

The reason why learning should be my main focus right now is the following:
My bankroll was ready to play 50nl many times, but i wasnt. right now beating 50nl is my next goal. because then i can create a relevant hourly. only at 50nl will i be able to create a meaningful side-income with the amount of time on my hands.
But even if my bankroll would be ready, i am just not ready. yes, i maybe could win at 50nl for 2-3bb/100, but thats not enough imo. with that winrate the variance is still pretty huge compared to 4-5bb/100, also the hourly is only borderline "enough". that, together with possible tilt through more variance (which i experienced a few times within the last weeks as you know) means i should not play 50nl right now even if my bankroll would be ready for that.
So the locial step would be to focus on improvement, and as already mentioned improving is most effective when playing zoom.

I am basically investing time in myself, accepting less €/h for the moment in order to get to the "beating 50nl" point faster where my €/h will be higher. the faster i get to 50nl, the more i will win long term.

the only downside from winning less per hour could be that i need to find money elsewhere in order to buy the coaching hours, because my winnings alone wont be enough anymore. (tbh they arent enough right now anyway lol)
but i am willing to also invest some of my pocket money into coaching, as i always did up to this point, because i am not at the point where my pokergame can finance itself yet. and i am fine with that. poker is still my #1 hobby, and i dont mind investing money into that hobby. in long term that money will pay itself back anyway, but even if not its no problem because all in all i enjoy playing poker.

I think thats what i want to say about this. most of it was just me writing down my thoughts, to get a clearer picture if i really want to do this. but the more i thought about this the more certain i got that i want to try this out. it will feel more productive, and i will get to where i want to be faster.

right now it feels like wasting time when i use the little time i have on studying, because i could get some hands in, and i really need more volume right now...
Posted 7 years ago
Some epic posts here and sorry I have not checked in for a while!

Seems you have the heart of a lion!!!