Haha I know your villain after 1,5k hands quite well good to know that i will find him at NL10 as well

i know that it is easy to press the 70% on Betfair and i am guilty of doing that myself way to often, but here I think you would do better without it.

from my point of view here is nothing wrong but you could go bigger on all streets. As I think Villain is going to be very inelastic in his callingranges there is no difference between 70% pot and 85% pot. This way you might make 30BB more in the end.

Thank you @FG_SpaceLord , it was what thought but asking is always better than guessing!

Was my initial read ok for villain by the way? They did seem a bit of a station.

Honest question: am I allowed to share this info?

pot pot pot

As to sharing info, what you are not "allowed" to do (this is such a gray area, so iirc what I'm talking about is what is banned under Stars TOS) is merge your database. You can't have in your HEM any hands you weren't dealt into. (Obv a lot of people do, that's partially how stables profit.) But you two talking about a guy, even showing each other a HH like here, that's no different than me at the casino telling a buddy, "Yeah seat 6 is an ag-fish, let him blast off."

Personally I think all HH converters should eliminate player names. I don't think it's fair that a V is "outed" in this way. But it is what it is.

Thanks @CycleVancouver for the advice. I agree about the HH names showing up. Soemtimes, when I'm actually in the real world I delete them. I think it's more ethical so that was a nice reminder, thanks again as always sir.

And ye, I thought my bets could be larger, need to get them right for moving up permanently soon.

Bet sizing thoughts:

1. It will maybe be a shock, but recalculate the hand if you went pot pot pot. Final pot is almost double.

2. This board is soaking wet. By betting "normal" 2/3 psb, we're giving him amazing odds to call with even a hand as raggedy as gssd+bdfd. This article on implied odds is from live play,but I found it pretty eye popping and go back to it from time to time. tl;dr is bet bigger. (FWIW I don't really like 2+2 but there are some gems on there.)
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/170/live-low-stakes-nl/what-you-implying-thread-about-implied-odds-1310066/

Super stuff, thank you very much. A little long for this time of night for me after a beer or 12 so I'll read it thoroughly again tomorrow.

Meanwhile good night and have fun.

Already been covered well but to give my agreement with bigger all round!

We have a villain that doesn't like to fold, a wet board with a lot of potential pairs/draws that can give us action, and a nutted hand. Never be afraid of an overbet vs this type of opponent by the way, with come creative sizes we can possibly play for stacks here.

To answer the above question, there is no issue at all with what was discussed in this thread. If we were to go into any kind of in depth analysis about a specific player on a public forum there could potentially be an issue, but not sure about that. Sharing DB hands as mentioned is a definite no no though. Agree hand converters should obfuscate all names.

I forget overbetting works here, thank you very much.

Learn 5 things today, forget 3 by tomorrow! Sigh.