Ppl are agressive from blinds these days and also 4b bluff alot.
So in this spot vs regs I am 4betting and getting it in.
Aside from QQ+ u will see lot of AK, AQ , TT and folds.

The problem with stacking off JJ at these stakes is the way that people have cottoned on to how profitable 3 bet bluffing is, yet the widest stackoff range you can expect in the vast majority of situations will still be QQ+, AK.

QQ and AK both have 40% give or take versus that range, but JJ only has 36% and that makes quite a difference when you look at the EV calculations.

Being able to defend by calling in position with JJ against what you think is a wide range will be super profitable. Of course you'll still have many difficult decisions on a lot of boards, but nobody said it would be easy. There isn't a simple answer to a lot of spots, you have to put in the work afterwards to see how you likely did.

I think this is totally fine as who really wants to play JJ out of position in a big pot.

I would always unless vs a huge nit or have huge reads just 4Bet get it in. I like your sizing also as it can make villain spew.

@StratoMan He had JJ IP here.

I'm not actually sure how much I like JJ as a 4bet here as you said... you just sat in. Also from the SB people will standardly 3bet SC's and suited aces all day.

So I think we can call and dominate so much of his range. Stacking off... I think we need a few more reads as I fully agree with what Turlock said about it here.

Getting it in should be fine. If his range is exactly QQ+, AK then you'll be losing a bit on the all-in but you can't know that for sure.

If you're up against a known tighter player, which you never will be at anon tables :P, then flatting will be better.

Fair enough, thank you very much everybody.

I wouldn't 4b to fold this hand. If you dont think its correct to get all in preflop then flat call is better. I think the decision should be made before deciding to 4b.